A special meeting of the PASRD was held on Tuesday, March 15. At that meeting the board voted to dismiss the existing validation process due to potential future costs and timing issues. In the last week, two community members sent proposals to the board for alternative funding options. Those two community members were invited to give details on those proposals to the board and community at the meeting in order to solicit input and questions. Details of these discussions can be reviewed in the recording of the meeting located here:
(there was a technical problem with the beginning of the recording so the recording starts several minutes into the meeting)
An electronic survey will be sent out in the next few days to gauge interest and support from the community for either of these proposals. If you were not in attendance at the meeting, it may be helpful to review the meeting recording to better understand some of these proposal options. Please get the word out to complete the survey and a link to the survey will be posted to the forum for those that might not get it by email as well.
Hello Whitney, (Nyle & Jim: Panoramic District Officers of the Board): We do have a few more questions. #1) You said in good faith that this survey was only to gauge support. If the money is found to have donors willing to supply the funds, (for either option) will this then move ahead?
The other evening at our follow up meeting, Tuesday, March 22, when I re-asked the question that we posed to you in the email we sent to the board before the meeting on the 8th of this month, regarding "our" road board liability insurance, the three board members allowed Lee Lucas, no longer on the board, to attempt to answer our question. We did not understand his explanation. (nor his proposal for that matter). #2) Could one of the three of you please direct us to where we can read the insurance policy that the Panoramic Road District has, it would be appreciated? Thank you kindly.
Whitney, I do apologize to you, as it seems you do all of this communication, so receive the upset end of residents asking questions. As Elise said in one of her replies, this duty should not belong to one person, and we agree.
Thank you again. Henry & Kerry Zenich